Samsung SGH-E210ALSO KNOWN AS | |
|---|---|
Construction | |
| Dimension | 91x45x18mm (3.58x1.77x0.71") |
| Weight | 89gr (3.14oz) |
| Form Factor | Clamshell |
| Material | |
| Colors | |
| Metal Frame | |
Usability | |
| Display Resolution | 128x160px |
| Display Size | |
| Display Diagonal | |
| Display Type | 256K TFT |
| Secondary Display Resolution | 96x96px |
| Input | Navigation Joystick / Button Numeric Keypad |
| Talk Time | 3 hours, 30 minutes |
| Standby Time | 9 days, 4 hours |
| OS | |
| Java | MIDP 2.0 |
| Vibration | Available |
| Ringtone | Polyphonic |
Hardware | |
| Chipset | |
| Processor | |
| GPU | |
| Ram | |
| Internal Memory | 17MB |
| External Memory | microSD |
| Camera Resolution | 1.3 Megapixel |
| Camera Flash | |
| Camera Lens | |
| Optical Zoom | |
| Front Camera | |
| Second Front Camera | |
| Front Camera Flash | |
| Other Functionalities | |
| Speaker | Mono |
| Battery Capacity | 800mAh |
| Battery Type | |
Connectivity | |
| WIMAX | |
| WiFi | |
| UPnP | |
| NFC | |
| USB | v2.0 |
| Bluetooth | v2.0 |
| Positioning System | |
| TV Receiver | |
| TV Out | |
| Audio Output | |
| Radio | FM |
| Ethernet | |
| Infrared | |
Cellular Network | |
| Network Compatibility | GSM 1800, 1900, 900 |
| SIM Cards | |
| PTT | |
| HSCSD | |
| GPRS | Class 10 |
| EDGE | Class 10 |
| AMPS | |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
Operators | |
Bharti Airtel | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Vodafone India | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Reliance Communications | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Idea Cellular | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
BSNL | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
TATA Docomo | GSM 1800 |
Aircel | GSM 1800 / GSM 900 |
Uninor | GSM 1800 |
VARIOUS | |
| Price Range | |
World Compatibility
N/A
2G
3G
3.5G
4G
REVIEWS
N/A out of 100
Softpedia
Samsung E210 looks sexy in just about any hand, on any coffee table and the gray version that we tested is made of pure elegance. Still, both external and internal displays ruin its classy look. The performance list turns out as being quite disappointing and the price tag almost shocking. The stylish design, ready for showing off, might be just enough argument for many customers to choose it over uglier, improved alternatives, as it usually seems to be the case with fashion phones that look more like accessories rather than communication devices. read more
